Sponsored

Tampilkan postingan dengan label Batman. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Batman. Tampilkan semua postingan

Superman Batman Public Enemies Review

 they are the two greatest heroes in the world Superman Batman Public Enemies Review
Everyone knows who they are, they are the two greatest heroes in the world. One is the big-blue-boy-scout, he wears bright colors goes out at day and has the powers of a god. The other is the Dark Knight, he wears dark colors, has no powers and has to rely on his wits and gadgets. How could these two ever work together?

When you have two of the greatest superheroes working together you've got to have a threat that's big enough that calls for both of them to be together. Lex Luthor is a good start, how about Luthor as president? When the movie starts we see the nation in a state of panic because of some kind of financial inflation, and Luthor in the middle of this carnage steps up and gets elected as president.

Later we see Superman easily handling a car chase, and meeting up with a few heroes who are now under Luthor's employ as government agents, they talk about Luthor's apparent reform but of course Superman say "I'll never trust him, he's a sick man" to which Major Force funnily reply's "He's not the only one to sit in the oval office." Meanwhile there is a huge meteor heading for earth, this could be easily handled except that the meteor is made of solid Kryptonite, so along with the Luthor trouble Superman goes to Batman for strategic help.

The man of steel is played by Tim Daly, who is reprising his role from Superman: The Animated Series. He hasn't played the character since 2000 and he slips back into the role with great ease, he was always one of my favorite Superman's, he is strong and commanding but you can tell he is gentle by nature. Batman is played by Kevin Conroy who hasn't been far from the role since 1992 with Batman: The Animated Series, he may be my absolute favorite Batman, he's dark, direct, no nonsense and always carrying the emotional weight of being Batman. Clancy Brown also reprises his role as Lex Luthor, he too has also been one of my favorites he encompasses the slimy businessman side of Lex as well as the egotistical mad scientist.

The drawing style is very much focused on the strong man idea of superheroes. All the heroes here have very tight outfits and look as if they have been taking steroids with their cereal.

The real strength of the movie comes with the interaction with Superman and Batman and how different they are. There's a scene where the two need to break into a lab, they are spotted Superman says "Now I really do look like a criminal" to which Batman responds "It's done wonders for me." They have had different experiences, go about their duties in different ways but they are on the same side even if their personality's don't match up all the time.

The two best scenes are when a battered Batman and an injured Superman have to get to the bat-cave, none of them are in good condition to fight or even walk straight. Each one leans on the other and together they slowly work their way to their goal. The other really good scene in the movie comes later when Batman steers a giant ship to destroy the meteor, Superman punches Luthor and says "That was my best friend, and you just murdered him." This is a great scene because it shows how close the two have grown beneath all the jokes and differences and probably if you've saved the world and had your life saved by a certain person, you would consider them a friend despite all differences.

Public Enemies is a high flying adventure that does not rely on the gimmick of having these two icons together, it relays on the strength of the two characters, playing to their strengths and their weaknesses.

Rating 3 stars out of 4
Download Movie

Supergods Review


Behold, I teach you the superman: He is this lightning, he is this madness!
-Frederich Neizche, Thus Spake Zarathustra
This is the quote that starts off Supergods (as well as a tribute to his wife) that Grant Morrison chooses to start off his book about the superheroes, from the comics to the screen to our very culture that seems to revolve around the bizarre creatures.  

Grant Morrison has been a successful comic book writer for over thirty years and now he has released a book  about his own thoughts, feeling and analysis on the superheroes.  Morrison is one of the most successful, as well as being one of the most controversial comic book writers in the industry so I cannot think of anyone better to give us a big say on the superheroes.  

I first came to know Morrison's work in Batman: Arkham Asylum one of the most surreal thought provoking graphic novels that I've read, its a great place to start in comics or just to prove to people that comics can be more than goofy, immature pieces for children, but sophisticated,  symbolic mature stories that can be more than intelligent.  Ever since I read that I've been reading whatever Grant Morrison that I can find, there are still pieces that I have not read but I've read most of his big works i.e. Flex Meantallo, All-Star Superman, New X-Men etc and am definitively a big Morrison fan.  Morrison offers not only great writing but a personality, he is great to see in interviews and listen too, I imagine that he would be great to have lunch with or have a drink with.  

The first handful of chapters of the book are an analysis, as well as his own personal view of the golden and silver age of comic books.  Morrison starts the book by deconstructing the cover of Action Comics number 1, the very fist appearance of Superman and the first superhero.  I always saw the cover as as a demonstration of Superman's strength (lifting a car with his bare hands) but Morrison gives us a deep look at the politics of that time and how it was really a defiance of the machine age that was taking over at that time.  

Morrison then goes on through the comic book timeline of how DC was the only giant in comic books and how they came out with Batman, Green Lantern, Wonder Woman, The Flash and so on.  Then he brings up the infamous crisis that was brought on by the "psychiatrist" Frederic Wertham, who released Seduction of Innocence, a book that claimed that all the problems of modern youth could be directly correlated to comic books and thus the industry took a huge hit and the only way to save them was to bring in the comics approval code which lead to the silver age.  Me and Morrison seem to have the same opinion of "Dr." Wertham and that is he was an old bastard that wanted to make a name for himself and saw a sasaran in comics. 

The silver age of comics is probably Morrison's favorite era of comics.  It was the easy going days, were the characters could have crazed adventure and imagination could sour to full throttle and have no regard for "reality" they were pieces of fantasy and his enthusiasm leaps off the words of the page and hits the reader in the face with it.  Whenever Morrison takes over a book he likes to take the characters back to their old original formula of the silver age, this is one of the reasons hes one of my favorite writers, he takes these characters that are more than sixty years old and can inject whole new life and dynamic into them. 

Later he brings up, of course, Marvel comics that came out with such hits like Fantastic Four, Spider-Man and the X-Men and how they brought their superheroes a little more grounded and flawed than the DC heroes that were a little more true blue so to speak.  I love the way he explains it by saying that the DC characters are the archetypes of the Gods and the Marvel character are the Titans. This section also contains a great cover analysis with the first issue of Fantastic Four, I had always seen it as the four beating back a monster, it is what they do best.  But Morrison says that its an example of the new kala of superheroes beating back the fifties monster that were popular and whose time has now come an end. 

Next is what Morrison refers to as the "Dark Age".  This has classically been called the Bronze age but this suits it better, Bronze implies that its the weaker of them and the eras would only get worse, but dark suits the kind of work that came out during that time better.  This was the age of Dennis O'Neil, Frank Miller and Alan Moore, when comics were dark and the art style was more photo realistic and the stories were more politically focused.  I don't think this is Morrison's favorite era, it was the time that brought superheroes grounded and dark, they were written more like TV shows or movies rather than embracing the crazy feats of wonder that were accomplished in the silver age.    

One of the problems through the book is Morrison's clear, non too subtle biff with Alan Moore.  Its sticks out to me how much he clearly dislikes him and how he highlights all the flaws with his writing and his ego but it just highlights his own ego, its not Morrison at his best. But even with his obvious bitterness he delivers one of the best analyses of Watchmen that I could have imagined.      

When he starts on this kala it becomes more than a document piece and part memoir and part biography where Morrison recounts his own life and his career and of course his own contribution to comics.  These sections do contain a bit of ego but they are justified.  He did write the graphic novel that inspired the best selling comics book video game of all time and he did bring The Justice League back to one of the best selling books.  Morrison has been writing comics for a long time and is one of if not the best at it and I think that hes entitled to look back with a grin on his great body of work. 

The book is a genuine joy to read because Grant Morrison doesn't write as if hes giving a lecture in a University, he writes like hes talking to someone about a subject that he really loves and has known about all his life, and he channels that enthusiasm and love into the writing and the reader can feel for him and the wonderful art-form that is comic books. 

During his sequence of memoirs he takes us through his nightmare time as a student in an all boys boarding school, to Animal Man to Doom Patrol to The Invisibles and his alien abduction and we get a peak inside of the man with one of the most unique imaginations on the planet from his days as a shy straight edge kid growing up in Glasgow to the rave dancing LSD taking comic book rock star that he would become.  

I don't read many books over two hundred pages so this was quite a commitment with its length being four hundred and twenty pages long but I was willing to make the commitment, for it was a book about comics and written by Morrison.  But will the average reader give this book the same chance that I did? maybe another fellow Morrison enthusiast or merely just a comic enthusiast would give it a read but who else would give this book a chance? 

My whole life I've grown up with the Superheroes.  They changed my life, I owe them a dept for always being there, giving me a big brother when I never had one, showing me to have spirit when I was down in the dumps and that no matter how bad or hopeless things get there's always a way.  This is the century of heroes, they are working their way into our culture and maybe some day our reality.
 
Rating: 4 stars out of 4  

Download Movie

Batman Begins Great Movie

When Bob Kane first created Batman within the course of a weekend he made him as a combination between Sherlock Holmes and Zorro.  He was the Dark Knight who was a moody loner and even used a gun to kill criminals (this was quickly rectified).  After the comics code of approval came into effect Batman got a colourful sidekick and became the campy crusader loosing almost all kind of drama and seriousness.  Then the age of Dennis O'Neil and Frank Miller who reinvented him back to his roots as a dark, psychopathic millionaire, fulled by revenge and rage.  This direction carried over to his movie carrier with Tim Burton's Batman and even more so with Batman Returns.  Then Joel Schumacher took over the franchise with a lighter touch then over did it with Batman & Robin.  After this disaster of a movie the studio knew that it was time to give Batman a break from the big screen.

It took seven years until Batman could return to the big screen and be reinvented for a new audience.  Sam Raimi and Daren Aronofsky lost the chance and David Fincher turned down the chance to direct so the duty to direct the new Batman would be turned over to the British up and coming star Director Christopher Nolan.  Nolan had gained big critical success with Memento and Insomnia, two wonderful thought provoking films but they don't seem like the Director seems interested in adapting a comic book character, but Nolan said he wanted to do it so the studio took a gamble and it payed off.

Batman Begins is one of the greatest Superhero movies made because it is more than just a fisticuffs explosion fest it is a character piece that brings in the audience and intrigues them with its deep sophisticated plot.  The movie takes its time building up the character of Bruce Wayne and takes its own liberties with the mythology.  We see little Bruce playing in his huge garden with his childhood friend when he falls down a water well and a swarm of bats come out of a hole and scare the eight year old.  His father comes to his rescue and tells him the way of fear and scary things.  These sequences show that little Bruce was just an innocent kid who lived in a world protected by his two loving parents, he had everything to loose.

The original origin had Bruce being taken too see The Mark of Zorro and exiting with excitement and joy, in Batman Begins they take Bruce to see an opera (as rich people do) and there is a scene with the actors dressed as bats descend on the stage and Bruce asks to leave so they exit early into a dark dingy alley where a desperate low life is waiting for an easy victim.  This (I consider) is an improvement on the original story because it puts more guilt on Bruce, it was his fear that lead to his parents leaving the theater and then meeting their doom, as well as this Bruce is dad (still just alive) looks to him says with his dying breath "don't be afraid". If that doesn't fuck with your head I don't know what will.

Christopher Nolan is a man obsessed with obsession, he loves to dive deep into the psyche of obsessed individuals and in comics there is no one more obsessive that Batman.  Nolan has stated that he was never that much of a comic fan, but he did have unique ideas to bring to the character, this leads to a fresh take on the character rather than the same old pop approach that we've seen in many other Superhero movies.

Nolan is a storyteller first and a fan second so he knows to put the right amount of set up and character before he appeals the fans more simple nature.  He does however have David S. Goyer as his co-scriptwriter, Goyer is a comic book fan so he brings the knowledge of who's who in this universe so certain names like Flass, Lobe and Falcone are strategically placed in the script to put the fans at ease that this is the world that Batman has always lived in.

For the casting Nolan used the original Superman movie as an example.  If you have a huge star as your pahlawan the audience will just see the star in that outfit.  So have a few key roles filled in with big names stars and have the star as an unknown.  Big name stars like Michale Cane, Morgan Freeman,  Gary Oldman, Liam Neeson  and Rutger Hauer more than make up for not having the main character as a star.

The role of Batman would go to Christian Bale, who had stared in such slipper hits like American Psycho and Equilibrium.  In those he proved he can play an intense psychotic bastard and pull off intense physical work so he seems like the perfect Batman.  Bale is one of the best Batman's no doubt, he nails the physical side of the character with the mastery of the Casey fighting style and of course he is in great shape.  Bale also channels his performance from American Psycho and down plays it to the right degree for Bruce Wayne as the big time playboy with a model on each arm.  Nolan also adds touches like waking up at three pm after a night of crime fighting and drinking healthy shakes to then do continual push ups, like an obsessive individual would.

We don't see Batman clearly until just about one whole hour into the movie.  The time leading up the that is spent building up to it with character development and rationalizing Batman's techniques and methods.  Why would a man dress as a bat?  to induce fear in his enemies and become more than a man but an icon for justice.  Why does he wear a cape? Because he gets heavily bruised by jumping from building to building so he uses the cape a para-glider.  The ears have surveillance equipment stored in them, the suit is an expensive solider suit that was too expensive to be put into commission.  Everything is there for a reason and serves a purpose.

The main merit I give Batman Begins is that it is a movie, it does not try to be a comic, it knows what it is and confident enough to stand by it principles.  It is dealing with iconic characters but Nolan adds his own naturalistic obrolan to again ground the characters and make them all the more relate-able.

The main theme of the movie is fear, overcoming it as well as using it to your own advantage.  Batman has always been a character who has had more than one demon on his shoulder and fear is an emotion that is incorporated into his very foundation from what he uses against criminals to what haunts him at night.

I have heard criticism of the action scenes being a cluttered mess of editing.  I like what they do, yes the camera may be a little too close but it makes the action feel more visceral and gives a feeling that we cant keep up with Batman.

The movie ends with Batman and a newly appointed lieutenant Gordon meeting on the roof with a newly placed Bat-signal (that appears faded and blurred on the clouds above, nice touch) and they talk about the up coming challenges they'll have to face and what having a man wearing a mask and jumping off rooftops might bring them.

Batman Begins brought the character of Batman into a unique psychological study from a sophisticated perspective.  It became more than a mere comic book movie but a fully respectable film for smart people not just the humble nerds.
Download Movie

The Dark Knight Great Movie

"If I search and seek inside my mind, the deeper I look the more I find. Exists a spiritual duality of darkness and light. My soul mirrors the world, the day and night."
-Tim Vallie
With the success of Batman Begins the anticipation for the next Batman movie was higher than it has ever been, it was the make or break time for the franchise, to prove whether it was a fluke or if the franchise had real chops.  Christopher Nolan had huge pressure and he knew that he had to deliver.

I was once asked what makes a good sequel and I instantly thought of The Dark Knight.  So my answer was "It has to build off the strengths of the first movie, it has to expand the story and the characters and be bigger than before and maybe question the rules and morals set down in the first movie".  These are good guide lines for a movie to set while making a sequel and The Dark Knight is the definition of a good sequel, taking everything that made the first movie great and expanding and making those elements bigger and better and fixing all the other little problems that they got from the first movie.

The movie begins with a bank heist where we see masked robbers infiltrate a high security bank.  While they go about the robbery they speak of the man who put this plan together, "now I know why they call him the Joker".  The guards kill each-other off one by one until only two are left and the one that has remained silent is left standing. He gets ready to leave before the bank clerk says that he is scum and "what do you believe in?", to which he replies "I believe whatever doesn't kill you makes you...stranger" while he removes his mask to reveal that the whole time it was the Joker himself under the mask, with the make up on the inside as-well as out.  This stands out to me as one of the greatest reveals in movie history, in the first few minutes we already feel the threat and have a taste of what this villain is capable of.

Following this we see the media in speculation, and criminals on the run from Batman.  Gangsters are now bringing dogs with them for more protection and buying from unlikely sources.  Gangsters meet up in a parking lot because they don't like what drugs they've been supplied with (what do you expect when you buy from the Scarecrow).  We see a silhouette of the caped crusader but then we see another one (that's not right), then one fires a gun, (that's definitely not right).  No these are just copycats taking the law into their own hands, but they haven't had his pelatihan and they get taken down by the gangsters which leads to the real Batman having even more to deal with on-top of the Gangsters, the Scarecrow and the dogs.  Ultimately the Gangsters and the Scarecrow get taken down (once again the Scarecrow has been shamefully underused) and Batman gets off with a few bite marks from the dogs.

Later being that Wayne manor was destroyed in the last movie Bruce Wayne is living in a penthouse and his new base of operations is a warehouse bunker that doubles as his temporary Bat-cave.  Bruce comes to the conclusion that his Armour is weighing him down too much and he needs to be more quick and flexible. So we get our new Bat-suit for this movie. The last suit was a soldiers suit, this time its a fiberglass, metallic and nylon compound in over two-hundred separate pieces and it takes on more of the look of high tech sports equipment.  But the greatest breakthrough that this costume has above all other live action Bat-suits is that this time Batman can turn his neck, kind of a funny thing when you think about it but there has never been a live action Batman that can turn his head.

Katie Holmes was replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaul for the role of Rachel Dawes in this movie and it was probably for the best though I didn't feel that it made a huge difference. In this movie shes still a smart female character who fights for the side of good, only in this movie she is torn between two men that she both cares deeply for. The third piece of this awkward love triangle is Harvey Dent Gotham's new District attorney, its White Knight. Dent is played by Aaron Eckhart with a good looking face and a smile that you can trust and accompanied with his fathers lucky coin he makes his own luck with it always working out in his favor.

Grant Morrison's description of Heath Leger's Joker is the best "a punk-influenced agent of performance-art-inspired chaos". It is impossible to talk about The Dark Knight without talking about him. Both the casting and the design of the character took me by surprise. Why Heath Leger? why the messy make-up? and of course the tragedy of the actor dying at the far too young age of twenty eight, which added a lot of hype on his performance.  Heath Leger's Joker is something you have to see in action to really appreciate it. As appose to the showmanship performances like Cesar Romero or Jack Nicholson, Leger delivers a truly frightening, twitchy performance that made this version of the Joker one of the greatest villains in all of movie history, all complete with scars across his face that give him a permanent smile and story of how he got them that vary each time to a point that I don't think he even knows how he got them.  He cares nothing about himself only about the chaos that he causes and spreads to others and he knows that if he can get Batman to kill him he will become even worse than he is. Heath Leger became the second posthumous to win and Academy Award, it was for best supporting actor and it was more than well deserved.

The dynamic between Batman and the Joker has lasted over seventy years for a reason, they are the perfect offset, Batman stands of order, Joker stands for chaos. It is one of the great rivalries of this century, it has lasted for nearly a hundred years and it will probably go on for another hundred. In The Dark Knight it is phrased perfectly by the Joker while dangling from a rooftop "this is what happens when the unstoppable force meets the immovable object", The Joker will never stop and Batman will never give up.

In Batman Begins the main theme and obstacle that Batman had to tackle was fear, in this movie its chaos and who better than have it be personified by The Joker, probably his greatest villain of all. In the first movie Batman's morals and methods are set up but The Dark Knight gives us a challenge that have to have those morals and methods tested, how far can Batman go? what will he endure in his quest for "justice"?  The first movies ideas are taken and put through the blender from hell.

One of the main images used throughout the movie are the strategically placed use of windows.  In about six crucial scenes there are rather large windows placed in the rooms to show the thin fragile wall that is placed between the "good", "civilized" people and the madness and chaos that lies on the other side.  They are wisely placed in more upper class areas like offices and penthouses, places of order and high class wear society and and order are placed so high and are exactly where the Joker would want to blow up first. 

The separation of the two worlds of order and chaos comes crashing together when Harvey Dent and Rachel are captured and placed in two different warehouses filled with gas tanks detonated to explode. Batman thinks he's saving Rachel but the information was switched and he saves Dent. Rachel dies, in what sick twisted world does the love interest die in a super jagoan movie? only the one that has guts. Both Batman and Dent lose their love but Dents emotional scaring is also visible and a new man is born, a man of black and white, live or die...Two Face. The scared side is horrific but realistic, and armed with this delusional, mad method of justice he goes out to decide if fate will let the people that have wronged him live or die. Armed with only a coin and a simple handgun.

The Jokers big, but not final, plan is one that only the most deranged mind could come up with.  While promising to deal great damage to the city as well as its citizens this causes great panic and the citizens flee, two boats leave, one with innocent civilians the other with Gotham's worst psychos.  Bombs are then found at the base of each boat and each boat has the detonator for the others, if one doesn't blow up the other then they both blow up at midnight. This not only puts the people in a budbahasa position but brings them down to be killers.

Finally the ultimate joke comes to fruition, Gotham's White Knight brought down, corrupted and scared and had already killed over five people with the flip of a coin, clean on one side, scared and burned on the other. With Dent deciding the fate of Gordan's family with a flip of the coin. And the tragedy of it ending in Dents death. With their White Knight, hero dead and the villain still alive the situation is dire, if the citizens of Gotham learn what really happened with Dent they will loose hope, they need faith but probably don't deserve it so Batman has to take it, he shall be the fall guy for what has happened on this the most darkest of nights, a jagoan in a world of darkness.

With Batman on the run for crimes he didn't commit and with his love and Gotham's White Knight lost Batman has sunk down to his lowest point and would have to have to stay there until the day when he would be needed to rise again.
Download Movie

The Dark Knight Rises Review

Christopher Nolan's Batman saga is at an end, after seven years the conclusion to this mind-blowing, game changing trilogy has come to its climax and everything is brought into the equation that makes this a whole of the Batman franchise.

Its been four years since The Dark Knight but the story takes place eight years later, where there is peace in Gotham. Everything is low form crime to Bruce Wayne's enthusiasm for...anything.  He has now become a recluse that has hardly ever been seen. The Batman name has been spoiled after the events of The Dark Knight.  Things seem quiet, but this is only the calm before the storm.

The villain is not the return of the Joker but Bane, the super strong behemoth that can physically best Batman.  Bane was a villain that I was surprised to see for the climax of Nolan's Batman film, he doesn't seem like the kind of subtle villain that would fit into this universe, but Nolan hadn't let me down yet so I waited in anticipation.  When I saw the pictures of him I didn't get more excited, but then I thought, "this is what you said about Heath Ledgers Joker", so I remained waiting in reserved anticipation. Tom Hardy as Bane is another of the great interpretation of a villain that I've seen.  The lesser more dumb interpretations of the character (i.e. Batman & Robin) just make Bane a big dumb, steroid filled brute who can hardly utter a word beyond some angry war cries.  Tom Hardy's Bane is well spoken and sophisticated.  He is a strategist that can not only match fists with Batman, but wits, the ultimate combination for a deadly villain.

Joining the cast of villains, or maybe not so, is Anne Hathaway as Catwoman.  I was excited to hear that Catwoman would be in the movie but I had mixed feelings about the casting of Anne Hathaway.  Now I love Anne Hathaway, but she is so recognizable, that I was worried that she wouldn't disappear the same way that others in the series did.  Luckily to my delight Hathaway pulls off a fantastic Catwoman, shes tough, seductive and struts with that classic sexy walk that's essential for any Catwoman. I had to wonder why they decided to use this costume design, when the Darwyn Cooke costume design would have been a perfectly practical direction to go with the design, but we have this one and its good.

Along with these, other characters are introduced such as Officer Blake played by Joseph Gordon-Levitt a young beat cop who still believes in what Batman stood for and stands against corruption and injustice.  Also Miranda Tate as Marion Cotillard a Wayne CEO that provides warmth and caring to a Bruce that has seen better days, as well as having a secret of her own.

The old characters still come full circle, Alfred refuses to stay and watch Bruce willingly destroy himself.  Gordon has to deal with the decision he's had to make over the course of his career, and confront the new evil that threatens Gotham.

The Dark Knight raised the stakes and made itself bigger, so naturally The Dark Knight Rises needs to top that (not easy).  Dark Knight gave us a situation of tremendous chaos, but Dark Knight Rises gives us a virtually apocalyptic scenario, criminals running the street, cops trapped underground and a nuclear bomb, that's ticking.

It wouldn't be a Christopher Nolan Batman movie, nay it wouldn't be a Christopher Nolan movie without a strong ever present theme that runs through the story.  This one is on the title "Rise".  The measure of a pahlawan can be interpreted in many ways, one thing that makes a pahlawan last, is his ability to take the punishment, take getting broken and get back up.  To be dealt impossible odds and a foe that seemingly can't be beat and rise above it.

The Dark Knight Rises does exactly what it says, it takes that Batman legend and it rises it to heights and turns it into an epic opera. Christopher Nolan has completed his trilogy of Batman, the standard has been set for the comic book movies.  It takes everything that is necessary from the vast mythology, the characters and combines them all together along with intelligent sophisticated storytelling that gives us a true final package to this seven year film series.

Rating: 4 stars out of 4
Download Movie

Top Ten Movies Of 2012

Well here we are we didn't die as the Mayan's predicted so I will be wrapping this year up with the Top Ten movies (in my opinion) of 2012. This also shows how much I've come with this Blog because last year I just made a general list of the movies that I didn't have time, or simply didn't get round to reviewing. This year I was able to post my review of whatever newly released movie quickly after I saw it so this year is more traditional.



10.  The Perks of being a Wallflower
A deep dark truthful look at the scary dark times that everyone must endure, High School










9. Amazing Spider-Man
An energetic fun reboot of the Spider-Man franchise that left me feeling hyped as hell for what comes next









8. The Artist
The old way are the best ways and this is a shining example that actions speak so much louder that words 











 



7. Prometheus
Ambition rarely comes in small packages and this is no such small package that has a massive canvas to paint on and paints in the corners








6. Ted
One of the funniest movies that I've ever seen in the theater and eagerly await Seth McFarland's next movie










5. The Dark Knight Rises
The conclusion to one of the greatest Superhero trilogies as well as one of the greatest Trilogies period











4. The Avengers
A true superhero movie thru and thru with characters that are true to their roots and believes in heroes













3. Chronicle
Superheroes are like any other genre there is more than one way to tell their story and this turns the Genre and makes it the most original well pulled-off from the last ten years








2. Seven Psychopaths
The ability to point out the the cliches within ones own medium is one thing but the pint them out as well as embrace them, play them out and keep the experience fresh and exciting is remarkable. Generously throw in a few memorable images and more that a few of some of the best characters and lines for the characters to read out and you have an instant classic







1. Samasara
Movies are a world unto themselves, this one has our world, all of it. Words to explain it are too few, enlightening, gorgeous, insightful, perfect, essential are some of the words that come to me off the top of my head, I recommend this movie to every man woman and child from wherever they are across this big wide world of ours
Download Movie

Injustice To Young Justice

It has now been announced that Cartoon Network has officially cancelled Young Justice. It was announced about a week ago that on the next slot for DC Nation for 2013 and 2014 that the slot would be filled with Beware the Batman and Teen Titans Go.

First of all I love Young Justice, it is a bold, well written, adult themed show that I thought was slowly dying out. Young Justice reinvigorated my love for superhero animation, I love the stories, the characters and the sophisticated drawing style. I started watching it just because it was superheroes and it was animation and the show played out and I was enjoying it, but then it took a nine, NINE month hiatus. When it came back I thought that it had worn out my interest and it had lost me as a viewer, but still I loosely kept in touch with it and it sucked me back in.

The most unusual part of the cancellation is that Young Justice has its fans and they have very loudly spoken that they want more Young Justice. The signed petition on Change.org has gotten over twenty three thousand votes to save the show.

The worst part about this is that along with this great show others are getting the can, Green Lantern The Animated Series, Motor-City are getting cancelled and the fate of Tron Uprising and Thundercats is still in the air. What is happening? why when we are just getting some really great animated shows are they getting cancelled, this is literally Firefly times four!

Why is this happening? I suppose I could agree the focus in the story and the characters has diminished since the last season but why cant the creators (Greg Weisman & Brandon Vietti) simply be told this and  work on improving this for the next season?

Still I am hopeful that if the petitions keep piling up and the fans keep speaking loudly enough they will bring Young Justice back. After all Futurama, Bevis & Butthead came back and soon Powerpuff Girls is coming back, so there's always hope.

I would say that I'm disappointed that the story is over but that would be wrong, its superheros its never over, just this version of these characters is ending. But still to paraphrase Doctor Who This show is ending, but the story never ends.

Goodbye Young Justice you will be missed.

Download Movie

Superman Great Movie

It was some time in the early nineteen-seventies that Ilya Salkhind decided that after they had such hits like Three Musketeers that they needed a new project to tackle, he for whatever reason, decided to adapt the DC comic book character of Superman. His father, Alexandra Salkhind, didn't know about it and he asked his son if people knew about this character, he assured him they did, so Alexandra agreed and they, intentionally or not, made history.

So to get their superhero epic off the ground they sought the help of one of the greatest writers in Hollywood, none other than the Godfather writer himself Mario Puzo. Ultimately Puzo's script would mostly be scraped for the simpulan version of the script and after three drafts he said he was done and wished them luck. But the next challenge presented itself, who to direct?

They tossed around a lot of names but the job would go to the then recent Omen director Richard Donner. Donner shared their vision that Superman should be an epic and they seemed to gel on most things however he said that he would only sign up for the job if the script went through a rewrite, they asked what he wanted rewritten and he replied "all of it." Apparently Puzo's script was really corny, apparently it was the Superman equivalent of the Adam West Batman. So Donner brought in Tom Mankiewicz for script treatments and together they scrapped the corny and brought in the wit and charm, but also they were meant to work on two movies, Superman was conceived as two movies, remember that.

OK so the Salkhind's had their funding, a screenplay and a director who shared their vision but they didn't have a Superman. What to do? Who could play the man of steel convincingly? Well they looked ow my they looked, they auditioned just about everybody from James Caan, Dustin Hoffman, even their family dentist, none of them were Superman, just a celebrity playing dress up. They got close with Robert Redford for a while but he eventually turned it down as well. Eventually the Salkhind's realized that they couldn't hire a star to play the role because there was no star that could play the role, nobody would see anything else than the star they cast falsely put into the Superman suit, what they needed was an unknown.

Alexander Salkind was against the idea because how could they advertise an unknown? But Ilya was insistent that they needed someone fresh to sell the role of Superman. But still the duduk perkara was they needed a star, so the compromise was to give other key roles to big name stars and not Superman. So for the role of Superman's father Jor-El went to one of the greatest screen actors of all time Marlon Brando, keep in mind this was after Godfather so Brando was at the height of his popularity. As for the nemesis, the criminal mastermind Lex Luthor, Gene Hackman.

The part of the man of steel eventually went to the twenty six year old, Julliard graduate Christopher Reeve. Reeve had only ever stared in one other movie before he got the role of Superman (and that role was a supporting part at best). But the casting of Reeve's is one of the greatest moves in movie history. Reeve's is possibly the perfect Superman, he really was six foot four, and carried himself with all the grace and confidence that an invulnerable man really would. So now all the peaces were assembled, all they had to do was make the movie.

As the movie starts an issue of Action Comics opens and it shows the city of Metropolis then the camera zooms into the comic itself saying to the audience that it is going to take us into the world of the comic book where a man can fly. Then we are moved through the city up into the stars and we listen to the movies score.

The music is handled by one of the greatest of all movie composers, John Williams. John Williams had already done the Jaws theme and Star Wars and I admit-tingly get the two mixed up while I try to hum one or the other. But what the Superman theme has for it that Star Wars did not was that it has great buildup. It starts as a little rumble, then builds and then finally comes in with a slam. Richard Donner described it best when saying that you can literally hear the music say Superman in the chorus. Next time you listen to the theme music listen closely and you can hear the people saying "its a bird, its a plane, no its Superman!"

Then we see the planet Krypton as a living diamond, like it where the peak of civilization, and we see Jor-El sentencing three Kryptonian criminals to punishment. Kryptonian imprisonment is the Phantom Zone where they get trapped in a suspected alternative reality within a mirror, or to that end. Jor-El sends the criminals away into deep space and addresses the council as to the next great threat that the planet faces, it's total destruction. The script for the Krypton scenes is handled to be as Shakespearean as if it's trying to come off sophisticated, it works well. The counsel dismisses Jor-El's theories and so he must make his simpulan move to save at least one life, his son Kal-El.

Jor-El puts him into a crystal container and sends him to planet Earth, where (with the help of the yellow sun) he shall gain incredible powers. This is a poignant scene that is one of the most pivotal character building moments of Superman, where he has been given everything that one father could possibly give their son.

The meteor then arrives in Kansas in all places where simple, humble farm people Jonathan and Martha Kent (Glenn Ford and Phyllis Thaxter) are driving by while the meteor lands next to the road their driving on. They investigate and they find a little lost boy inside the wreckage, they have their suspicions as to where he came from but after he lifts a toe-truck they have little doubt that he's not local.

Then we see that little baby grow up into a teenager and going through most of the hard times that teenagers go through, with dealing with jerks and being awkward around girls. But the thing is he's faster and stronger than any one of the players on the football team. Then comes another one of the scenes that I think is one of the most perfect and saddest scenes ever, Jonathan Kent talking to his son saying that Clark is here for a reason, and its not to score touchdowns. Then as they walk to the house Jonathan's arm has pain in it and Jonathan Kent says "oh no", then dies there. Then Clark is left even more alone and despite all his power he couldn't save the one he cared for the most.

Knowing now that he must follow his destiny he goes North (I don't really know why). But it is there that his fortress of solitude gets constructed and he meets his Kryptonian father, Jor-El, appearing as a ghostly floating head. Again comes one of the great scenes from the movie where Jor-El delivers him a message as to why he was sent to Earth of all places, why was this great powerful being sent to this planet where we have done so much wrong? He says "they can be a great race of people Kal-El, if they wish to be. They only lack the light to show them, for this reason above all, their capacity for good, I have sent them you my only son." Batman represent the hopelessness and overcoming it anyway, Superman is the optimism, he is the shining example for the good that we can reach if we really want to.

So now he knows what to do, and how he can do it so he heads to the hustling, bustling city of Metropolis where he gets a job as a reporter for the Daily Planet. But not as the man of steel but as the mild mannered reporter from Kansas, Clark Kent.

Before in the comic books Clark Kent was a cowardly little man in the face of disasters and giant robots, in the George Reeves TV show he was an intelligent witty reporter whose only difference to Superman was the glasses, which just makes everyone around him seem like idiots. Christopher Reeve plays him a bumbling, clumsy fish-out-of-water country boy who is used to the wide open spaces and is always bumping into things in the fast moving, claustrophobic city of Metropolis. As Clark Kent he channels Carry Grant and is never above giving a smile to the audience, both figurative and literally.

For Superman Reeve's plays him more like an on-duty cop all business and no nonsense, does the job and moves on. Superman's first night of crime fighting has everything in it, all problems big or small he helps with, whether they be a master thief stealing jewels, a falling plane or even a simple girl unable to get her cat out of a tree. But still he doesn't make it overly macho, in the late seventies it was now considered OK for men to display gentleness and frailness, this was for the best, for if he was to play it macho he would have come off insecure, here you believe he's the real deal.

The movie, like any good Superhero movie waits and saves its reveal for the full view of its hero. We don't get a shot of Superman until over a whole hour into the movie. Until then we get scene after scene of character building, of the characters motivations and powers. Like the scene where Clark and Lois get mugged (by an oddly well dressed crook) and Clark is able to catch the bullet, the audience watches this scene and can do the math, he's both fast and strong.

Lois Lane is played by Margot Kidder and unlike the more dull reporters of the past incarnations of the Superman mythos she plays her as a cynical, hard nosed reporter that will get the story by any means necessary. She also plays it two ways, while shes around Clark shes the witty go-getta and when shes around Superman she swoons and turns into a little High School girl with a crush. That is a little sexist and it doesn't stand up in this day and age but for the time it came out and the fact that she is still a good reporter I'll let it slide.

The tagline of the movie is "You will believe a man can fly", and the crew delivered on that. Sure in this day and age they would just CGI the whole thing but for this there was no technology or other way of doing flying that they could use, they had to develop their own ways of pulling this off. They had to build huge rigs so that they could lift the actors up and down, lots of blue screen and to the crews credit you never see this strings. The role for the actors was very physically stressing but there was always Donner there to make it feel more fun than it was work.

Gene Hackaman plays Luthor as what Steven Spielberg referred to as a "Champagne Villain" a villain that knows he's a villain and loves it. A smug self indulgent villain that purposely surrounds himself with dimwits just so that he will always know that he's the smartest man in the room, speaking of which. Ned Beatty plays Otis, Luthor's bumbling henchman who plays it well for comedy. Whats interesting about this casting that both Hackman and Beatty where very well known for their serious acting but here their doing comedy. But they do it well. There is some negative criticism about Hackman's performance, admit-tingly there are better portrayals of Luthor but he has his moments of true menace, he really does enjoy doing evil, having the world under his thumb, the performance works for me.

Then Luthor comes out with his big evil scheme, he has hacked two nuclear missiles and will use one of them to sink California, and he can then build his own cities, so the greatest criminal mastermind has a real-estate scandal...hmm. Superman gets to him but Luthor has his Achilles heel, Kryponite. Which renders him weak. But still even when he gets it off there are still two missiles to take care of. He takes care of one by throwing it into space but the other one hits and Lois Lane (who's in the middle of a story) gets trapped in her car and Superman doesn't get there in time.

Then comes the moment that is the real test of your suspension of disbelief. Superman in his moment of desperation and defiance of both fate and his fathers orders takes to the sky and spins counter rotation so fast that he literally turns the world backwards and thus reverses time. This scene has either been the breaking point for some audiences or others have just gone with it. I asked my physic teacher once what would happen if this would really happen, and he said that the amount of heat energy that Superman would generate to fly that fast would burn up the oceans first before the world would turn back one inch. My friend came up with an interesting theory for this scene, its not Superman flying that turns the Earth back, what is happening is that he's moving so fast that he's pushing through time and space itself. Here are two comments that have been brought up that have gone unnoticed in previous years, 1) Superman is flying so fast that he could have easily caught each of the nuclear war heads, no duduk perkara 2) when he does go back in time and make sure Lois is OK there should be another Superman flying around somewhere, wheres the other Superman? This is a huge paradox in the space time continuum. As for me I love the scene, its so Silver Age.

Superman made history with its characterization, writing and epic scale special effects to a previously poorly handled medium with full length features. It went on to gross three hundred million from a fifty million dollar budget.

This is the standard of Superhero movies, with the epic scale, fun pace and great special effects (that still stand up to this day). The pahlawan is placed into the real world and each scene serves to build on him and what he stands for. There are those (mostly adolescents) that say to hell with Superman, Batman's cool, well that just shows how immature they are. Superman is honest, good and true, whats cooler than that.
Download Movie

Superman Ii Review

During the production of the first Superman movie, the production and the budget kept getting off schedule and Richard Donner had falling out after falling out with the Salkhinds, so much so that Donner just avoided them altogether. Donner was instructed to focus on just getting the first Superman movie finished. At this point half of Superman two was shot and when the first move came out it was a huge hit. But the Salkhinds were in charge and they were as sick of Donner as he was of them and he was booted out of Superman two and they brought in Richard Lester.

The Salkhinds were on good terms with Lester due to him previously directing one of their early hits, The Three Musketeers, in fact he was even one of their choices to direct the first movie. So even though most of Superman two was shot anyway, Donner was kicked off and Lester took over. Lester, legally, had to direct a certain percentage of the movie to have his credit as director. So new scenes were added and he even re-shot scenes that Donner previously did. The Slakhinds clearly had such detest for Donner, this could have not been the most financially efficient move, but they were that sick of him and so, there we have it.

Superman two's plot revolves around the three Kryptonian villains that we saw at the start of the first movie getting out of their imprisonment and reeking destruction on Earth. We then move to Metropolis were Clark Kent is still very mild menard and Lois Lane is still a witty gogetta. There is a terrorist plot in Paris and Lois is on the scene and Superman isn't far behind to the rescue. Superman throws the bomb into space and in all the vastness of the cosmos it hits the Kryptonian criminals floating mirror. They are now free and heading for Earth.

Later Clark and Lois visit a Niagara falls resort on a story and when Lois decides to clean Clark's glasses she notices that without them he looks a lot like that guy who flies around and catches her a lot...huh. It is with this...shocking revelation hat Lois Lane is beginning to put the pieces together and suspects that Superman and Clark Kent might be the same person. After one failed attempt she tosses the idea away but after a very clumsily handled scene her suspicions are confirmed.

I enjoyed Richard Lester's work on the Beatles movie A Hard Days Night, but there while the choppiness of the pacing and the editing worked to get across the quick passe and the quick punchline nature and style of the comedy, here it works less well. Some of the handling are as if Guy Richie worked on the script, with it just relying on cheap punchlines.

So Superman takes Lois to his fortress of solitude for some alone time and seeks advise, not from his father but from his mother? Another choice that was made was that they would cut out Brando from the movie, no more Jor-El, instead the focus is pushed onto the mother Lara (Susannah York). Now there's nothing wrong with having the focus be on the mother, but that's not what was built up from the first movie. The first movie was all about the father son relationship, this is of course because Brando was so expensive they didn't waste a second of his time and used him to his full benefit. Now it seems as though the filmmakers scraped him just so they could save the pennies.

The Kryptonian villains here are Ursa (Sarah Douglas) as a cool, shrill, sadistic vileness that loves what she does. Then there's Non (played by former former boxer Jack O'Halloran) as a huge lumbering brute, he's just the big tough one, theres nothing else to him him other than that, but  both the characters and the movie knows it so its OK and its used for some decent laughs. Then we have Zod, General Zod played by Terence Stamp. General Zod is one of the most enjoyable villains for a superhero movie history. He is both reasonably threatening, hilarious and so enjoyably two dimensional along with a deep voice that sounds electronically lowered. He is one of those villains that knows hes a villain and his constant demand that Superman "Kneel before him" is always a highlight that never gets old.

In the end we get a scene that makes the whole movie worth full price, even though most of it is solid. The scene where Clark Kent walks into the Daily Planet and and then has a painful heart to heart with Lois. Even though they love each-other there's is a love that can never be, because, as the old saying goes, the needs of the many out weigh the needs of the few. And so Clark is forced too erase Lois's memories of her knowing the truth about Clark's secret identity. This scene is on par with the death of Jonathan Kent and as anyone who has read my Superman review will know that I consider that scene one of the most prolific scenes for Superman. However how he does it is another subject altogether.

Clark erases Lois' memories, fair enough, but he does it through a kiss. How was he able to do that? when did he get that power? does this always happen when he kisses people? Questions, questions this scene raises (more so that the spinning of the Earth rotation, for some reason). For all its faults I think its because Superman never demonstrated this power in all of his previous history and so this just comes off as unnatural to fans of the Superman lore.

Even though Superman two has its problems, most of them I have knowing the behind the scenes problems, it still is a really solid sequel. It expands and raises the stakes from the first movie and expands on the sacrifices and responsibilities that come with being Superman.

Rating: 3 1/2 stars out of 4
Download Movie

Superman Ii: The Richard Donner Cut Great Movie

With the huge disputes that erupted during the filming of of the first Superman movie Richard Donner was shoved off the project and Richard Lester was brought in, even though most of Superman two was shot and bringing in a new director could not have been the most efficient move to make, both financially and for time. Some of what Donner shot was used in the selesai movie, other clips were re-shot so that Lester could have legal claim to the role of director. Most of the movie was stored away.

Ever since the advent of the DVDs it has been made possible for filmmakers to go back and put in what was lost in their movies. Lester's version had been criticized for relying on comedy over the core drama from Donner's version, so the fans sent their E-mails, their letters, sighed their petitions and so Warner Brothers rummaged through their vaults and found Donner's footage and with the help of Michael Thau they cut the movie.  And thus we are given Richard Donner's selesai version of Superman two, or as close as we will ever get to it. According to Wikipedia eighty-three percent of the footage is Donner's footage.

When the credits start we get an appropriate tribute to Christopher Reeve, and then Richard Donner's name as director, where it should be. Then the movie begins and already the movie starts differently from the first, with it more skilfully weaving together with the first movie. One of the nuclear missiles that Superman throws into space hits the Kryptonian villains in their phantom zone prison and unleashes them and they head towards Earth shouting "FREE!" This works better than the frankly poorly handled scene with the Eiffel Tower, however it does have its faults. It works with weaving Superman one and two together, but for the audience who had to wait a year for Superman two I don't think this would have flowed super well and still there's the persoalan that in all the cosmos that particular nuclear missile hit that particular space where three entrapped super criminals were drifting, I don't care if its a nuclear explosion space big pretty huge.

Next we rejoin Clark, Lois and Jimmy in the Daily Planet. Lois pieces together that Clark is in fact Superman (took her long enough) and then she proceeds too trick Clark to revealing his true identity. So she jumps out the window, she sounds stable. Seriously though I really like this scene but remember to go into it with high suspension of disbelief. Anyway, she jumps out saying that "you'd never let me die Superman" and while she falls, Clark speeds down to the sidewalk softens her fall with super-breath, activates a canopy, softens her fall again and then speeds back up in the office. I love this scene, its like something out of All-Star Superman and it really is like something out of the comics. It also works because it shows how Lois Lane can even make Superman work hard.

One of the most interesting things about watching Superman two and then moving on to Superman two: The Richard Donner Cut is that we are seeing the same movie, essentially. They are the same movie, where they have the same plot but each director goes about telling their story in different ways, we really do get to see how important a director is with two completely different people being handed a plot to a movie and they each produce a very different movie.

One of the most prominent and frankly in my opinion the best changes to the movie is the inclusion of Marlon Brando as Superman's father Jor-El. Jor-El may be my favorite role that Brando has ever performed and I consider it a great shame that Lester decided to cut him out of the movie. It is a real gem to see Brando come back as Jor-El, transmitting his consciousness to his son. Funny enough this is much like the situation for Brando, his performance being transmitted to us (the audience) after his death.

Being that this is Donner's footage being used (as much as is possible) we are literally seeing a re-cut movie from the ground up, what we might be seeing are retakes of certain scenes and deliveries of lines. It makes watching the movie through a microscope an interesting experience and makes almost each shot interesting to think about. Is this a Donner shot or a Lester shot?

Another one of the best changes to the movie is in how Lois reveals Clark's secret identity. Clark enters Lois's hotel room and after some light banter she pulls a gun on him and pulls the trigger, again Christopher Reeves genius is shown here because he literally transforms from the mild mannered reporter to Superman, all through body language. After the truth is out Superman says "you know if you were wrong, you would have killed Clark Kent" to-which she reply's "how with a blank?" it is a very charming, well-thought-out and very well executed scene that is head over heels above the stupid clumsy reveal in the Lester version where Clark's hand falls in the fire. Whats most interesting about this scene is that they never really shot it, or at least officially. What you see is rough practice/test footage that they did before the official shoot began. You may notice that when Christopher Reeve walks off camera and it cuts to a close up he suddenly drops a few pounds, when he walks back in he has much longer hair and is a few pounds heavier again and the lighting is sloppy and the characters are a little out of focus. Even as test footage this is amazing to see, the actors gave their all in this performance where they were meant to take it a little easier.

This version of the movie is actually about ten minutes shorter than the original Lester version, even though they frankly had to bite the bullet and use what footage Lester gave them they still cut out parts of that footage. They cut out all of, or at least most of the punchlines that Lester wrote into the movie, this works because now we get a more mature feeling, streamlined movie.

However some of the problems with this cut are the fact that they do take out some of the funny lines of the Lester cut, if I had my way the perfect version of Superman two would be just a few minutes longer with a few of the punchlines that were in the Lester version, because there were some good ones in there. Another persoalan with the two versions is that the clip were Superman and Lois are in bed together, embracing each-other after clearly having had sex is that now it comes before Superman makes the decision to become human. That just strikes me as wrong. Superman is an alien after-all so even if he wanted to, he probably cant mate the way normal humans do so the fact that he does it now just doesn't coagulate with me, maybe its because you just don't accept your childhood heroes having intercourse or there is some truth in what I'm saying, either way its wrong to me.

The other part that I feel doesn't work in this version is the ending and unlike the nit-picky, persoalan I had with Lois and Superman having sex, where you can make arguments for either way this is not, this is a bigger persoalan overall with the movie. In this ending of the movie they cut the scene where Clark erases Lois's mind through powers that he never demonstrated before, instead they reuse the spinning the word backwards move that they pulled at the end of the first movie and use at the end of this movie as-well. This is wrong, for many reasons, for plot, for character, for the audience...lets go over why.

First of all, in the first movie Superman did this because Lois was lying dead in his arms and he couldn't save her and he did it out of the spur-of-the-moment and desperation, here it seems like he was just lazy and didn't want to deal with the consequences, OK so you could say that some of the reason to it was that he was sparing Lois some of the pain of not being able to be with him but the mind erasing scene works just as well. Another is that nothing is accomplished, everything from damage being done, to Zod, Ursa and Non still being out there (although that does mean that Superman didn't kill anybody) to Superman's Fortress of Solitude being spick and span. OK you could say that this means the villains could come back for a sequel, but what does that really mean? It just means that if they ever get out again the same thing will happen or Superman can just spin the Earth around again and hey presto nothing to worry about. All the stakes are taken out of it and we are left with a world that we don't need to worry about anymore. As much as I loved the spinning the world backwards in the first movie because of its childlike science and sliver age logic this time it just comes off as lazy.

I also hate the ending because if there was anything that made Lester's Superman two worth its salt was the scene where Lois and Clark sit down and have to let each-other go, that was a great scene, this was not a great move. But honestly everything else that is added and taken away makes for a much more better movie and does this change hurt me, yes. But the rest more than makes up for it.

Is Superman Two: The Richard Donner Cut the perfect definitive version of Superman two? No, I don't think so. But it is damn good. Superman two: The Richard Donner Cut is still the definitive version of the movie to me. It is the smarter, less silly version of the movie. In truth I recommend both of the movies, especially seeing them back to back. Each of them have their drawbacks but both are solid movies, only thing is one of them is very good and the other is great.
Download Movie

Superman Iii Review

The Superman movies are infamous for taking a sudden dive in quality. They had two movies under their belt that had reached previously unreached heights for superheroes in movies, but then something happened and the quality just took a nosedive and got virtually unwatchable. The not very subtle transition started with Superman three.

As soon as the movie starts, it is clumsily handled and unfunny. It works by having one thing leading to another, its pointless, it says nothing about the movie itself and the comedy doesn't work because there's no flow or grace to it. Already there are bad signs.

Next we see the next big duduk kasus with the movie, Richard Pryor. Richard Pryor plays Gus a funny (not really) out of work bum that want the money and doesn't want the work. The duduk kasus with Pryor is the same duduk kasus that sometimes comes with Robin Williams, he's funny yes but he still needs direction and if you just let him go off then we have meaningless compensation. Another is that, I guess Richard Lester fell in love with him so much that he forgot about Superman and just directed most of the attention of the movie on Pryor. He also has the ability to use computers really well, how? Hell if I know, because the plot needs him too. He clearly doesn't really know anything about computers, its all for the plot and no thought went into character.

Later, at the Daily Planet Lois Lane goes on vacation too Bermuda and Clark goes to the old home town of Smallville. Fun fact the reason Lois Lane is hardly in the movie is because Margot Kidder hated how the producers kicked off Richard Donner from the second movie. When Clark gets to Smallville he finds a familiar face from his past, Lana Lang his old childhood crush. Lana Lang is played by Annette O'Toole who is quite good, she's rather lovely and warm to watch as she personifies the old love interest that we really want to go back too. Shes one of the highlights of the movie, and there are so few.

Later Pryor gets a job working for a big computer company and he is reveled to be a computer prodigy and the bad guy (I don't care what his name is) hires him to use a weather satellite to affect the weather and take out the competition, a field of coffee crops in Columbia. Computers dont work this way and clearly the writers didn't care how they worked they just needed a plot.

But of course their plan fails because... hey remember that big blue guy? Of course Superman saves the people from their evil plot. So clearly they have to get Superman off their backs so they remember that more charismatic, more well developed evil mastermind Lex Luthor used kryptonite and got pretty close too him (he failed but he got close). So they find some but when they do there is an unknown element in it, when they give it to Superman there seems to be no effect, he doesn't weaken at all or anything. However the effects take time and eventually Superman becomes lazy and selfish. You may be thinking that it was red kryptonite that did this and you'd be correct but it isn't red kryptonite, its green. Why? why not red kryptonite, it should be, red kryptonite was around long before this movie came out so why not? there is no good reason why. Perhaps either the filmmakers were lazy or they assumed the audience were really stupid.

Even though at this point in the movie I don't care about hardly anything anymore Christopher Reeve does actually play a good evil Superman. Reeve plays both Supermen really well, he is truly a despicable evil Superman when the kryptonite takes hold of him, there's also a nice touch with the costume literally getting darker and darker with his personality. There is actually a scene where he downs some, whiskey I assume, and he then staggers out of the kafe and when I saw that I said "Ow my god Superman's wasted".

When this movie was in development Braniac was going to be the villain. First of all that would have been awesome (although they probably would have screwed that up, so it was probably for the best). Knowing that you can sort of see that within the bizarre simpulan version of what the movie has become. The computers and in the end the computer does come alive, sort of. Braniac is a Superman villain that has never seen the big screen and it was probably for the best that his name was not tarnished by this movie.

There is however one joke among all the other failures that does actually stand out as a really funny joke. Its when the bad guys assistant is all alone and is reading a book and actually comes out with a really intellectual theory after reading it and when others enter the room she puts on her dolly voice and acts like a duns again. There is actually something too think about here, about how society appreciates and accepts a pretty blondes who are stupid and does not accept one that's actually smart. Am I over analyzing? possibly. But frankly that's the only hope that I have to stretch out and grab on to.

Superman three is everything that was wrong with Superman two, accept that Superman two's flaws were small and nitpicky. Superman three takes those flaws and blows them up too huge heights and makes then the main focuses of the movie. Is it entirely bad? no there are some good moments with Lana and Richard Pryor is good at some small points. But this is a weak follow up to a movie series that had high production values too it's name and I'm certain that it was only based on the reputation of Superman one and two that led to this being a financial success.

Rating: 2 stars out of 4
Download Movie

Superman Returns Review

This is the way the world ends, not with a bang , but a whimper
T.S. Elliot 
Bryan Singer had made huge headway with the first two X-Men movies propelling the superheroes into the twentieth century. Now that he had a lot of reputation under his belt he decided to undertake one of the greatest superheroes of all time, Superman.

The big buzz about this movie was that Singer was going to make it canon with the previous Donner and Lester movies (assuming three and four are taken out of the equation) and continue the story from there.

Superman Returns is about a Superman that went away for five years and then returned to a world that might not have needed him and a world that had also gained more problems that he knows how to deal with.

Brandon Roth is our Superman this time and he does a pretty good job, he is clearly channeling Christopher Reeve but does it well to the point that you can buy him as Superman. Bryan Singer made a huge effort to find someone to fill the boots of Reeve and one of the things he wanted was someone that looked like Reeve and Roth does do that, its almost a little creepy seeing him at some angles because he really does look so much like him. However the channeling also weighs him down sometimes, you can tell that Bryan Singer was probably telling him to be more and more like Reeve and his performance comes off just a little bit stiff, trying to be like Reeve and not giving us Roth's Superman.

We also get to see what Lois Lane has been up to in the time that Superman has been away, shes a mother. Wait what? That's right, Lois Lane the hard nosed reporter now has a four year old son as well as a partner named Richard, played by James Marsden.

James Marsden has built a career of being the rejected love interest, think about it, Cyclops in X-Men, the prince in Enchanted. Its hard to watch here because he's not a jerk or a coward or even does anything wrong. His only sin is that he got in the way of Lois and Superman. Perhaps that's why, its certainly not his fault, its just that he was the unfortunate one that got in-between two people that were meant to be.

A nice added touch, is that Bryan Singer used Marlon Brando's footage as Jor-El. Its good too see that Singer wasn't as cheap as Lester and even though its not never before seen footage that was in The Richard Donner Cut, its still good too see Brando as Jor-El. It is getting weird that Brando just like Jor-El is projecting himself long after his death.

For all its faults Superman Returns is well shot, the cinematography is nice and well lit. We do get the image and the grandness that Superman should come with and it does come with ambition. The persoalan is the same persoalan that made Star Trek the Motion Picture so hard to watch, its so ungodly boring!

Superman Returns is two and a half hours long, that's a long time for the average movie goer. I am for movies being longer because it means that the audience develops patience, the persoalan with Superman Returns is that it doesn't need to be a two and a half hour long movie. Shots drag on for too long and there are some shots, even some whole scenes that could be cut out of the movie and not be missed.

Another aspect of the movie that I admire about it is that even though this was the first Superman movie to come out in a few years and it wasn't the origin story told again, it was the next story. Whenever a superhero film franchise takes a break and comes back the producers always feel the urge to tell the origin story again and again. They must think that the public has a very poor memory, or they themselves have very poor memory.

Lex Luthor returns in this movie and he is played by Kevin Spacey. Like most of the movie he channels Gene Hackman's performance of Luthor. But here he gives himself more freedom and lets him play Luthor as Kevin Spacey would play Luthor i.e. like Kevin Spacey.

Perhaps the greatest flaw is that this is a continuation of the Donner/Lester movies and Singer and the writers get dragged down with the references and trying to tie this movie into the previous movie continuity and not allowing them to tell their own story. However its not bad looking, and if you have seen the previous movie then its still good for at least one watch.

Rating: 2 1/2 star out of 4
Download Movie

Superman Doomsday Review

Superman Doomsday was the first of the DC animated straight to DVD line of movies, so it only makes senes that they would adapt one of the most pivotal stories to ever grace the man of steel. The Death of Superman (released in 1992) is still the highest selling comic book of all time.

The cast is a big departure from the crews previous cast of their other shows. Adam Baldwin is Superman this time and he is a much deeper tougher sounding Superman than we are used to hearing Tim Sale and/or George Newburn through the years, but it works well in this version of the world that they've created. Anne Hetch is Lois Lane and she is the strong cynical character that I'm sure everyone will like, I had some trouble hearing her the first time I saw the movie but as the movie went on and after repeated viewings it was obvious that she was a very good Lois. James Marsters is our Lex Luthor this time and just like Anne Hetch it was weird at first but over the course of the movie and over repeated viewings it became obvious he was the right choice. He's a more oily, despicable Luthor than the smooth, debonaire Clancy Brown.

The story is about the ultimate challenge that Superman has to face in fighting the great physical terror of the alien being named Doomsday, a creature of pure rage and destruction. Superman is pushed to his very limits and beyond, Doomsday will not stop ergo Superman cannot stop. Until eventually the victory costs the man of steel his very life.

The movie adapts over a years worth of comics into a seventy minute movie but it works because it keeps the focus of the story itself, what does  the the death of Superman mean? The movie shines because its their icon and their inspiration taken away, and what happens when peoples icons get taken away? they feel depressed or become bastards. I am a little torn weather or not the characters would act like this but its good enough characterization.

The movie also shines as an example to all the stupid people that say "ow Superman sucks because he's so strong and he's never in any real danger". Those people can suck it! because here he is in danger, he is in pain and still he keeps fighting, to the very end.

The music by Robert Kral, is just a real solid score. Its big and bombastic, which is essential for a superhero movie score but also sounds like Superman.

Superman Doomsday is a three act movie, but its also a very three act movie. Each act is distinguishable from the other and it even has a different director for each of the acts. Brandon Vietti handles the first and he's the perfect one to handle all the grim and gritty fighting with Doomsday. Lauren Montgomery takes on the heavy emotions of the second and she deserves great praise because I've praised her for directing great action scenes but she does great drama too. Then finally Bruce Timm, the man himself, handles the triumphant return of the third act.

Being that this is the first of the DC movies and they were liberated from the PG rating and were allowed to go PG13 they make the use of that freedom with letting characters actually die. However they cant have an R rated movie and looking at the movie they have some clever tricks to convey the deaths without making them too mature or gruesome, they do it by having Doomsday holding a soilders head, panning away and then hearing a crack, its very effective. Its also almost liberating to hear the characters speak some more mature words, like "ass" and "ow hell".

There is a hilarious joke within the movie where after Superman takes out a giant robotic spider controlled by Toy-Man a man in a observing crowd says "like we needed his to take out a giant spider, lame". This is a reference to the Superman movie Kevin Smith wrote in the late nineties named Superman Lives, it would have been weird. And guess what, Kevin Smith voices this character.

Superman Doomsday isn't the best of the DC Animated Movies but it was a really solid start to a really solid line of movies. It is also a dark Superman movie but with an acception to it, this still understands Superman and makes the right moves in making the story dark, while not defiling the character. Superman Doomsday is the darkest Superman story that can be allowed.

Rating: 3 1/2 stars out of 4
Download Movie