Marval Movie

It was announced around two days ago that the two movies that would make up the film adaptation of The Hobbit would become three movies making this a three part movie saga.

Originally the first movie was to be called An Unexpected Journey and the sequel would be titled There and Back again (as keeping with the book).  So now that there is a whole new movie, what will the third be titled? or will the third title be squeezed into the middle? This raises many questions, one of the first is that it was announced that the first movies run time would be two and a half hours, does this mean that the first film will be trimmed down to say two hours and the rest will be spread out with the other two movies?

Jackson Is the man responsible for the original Lord of the Rings trilogy one of the best in movie history so he has every right to tell the original prequel.  But the Hobbit is A) significantly shorter that everyone of the
LOTR 's books. B) a more simple, humble grounded story and less big and fantastic than LOTR.

As of right now I am reading The Hobbit, its going good and I am enjoying it (I'm about half way through it).  I am looking forward to seeing the translation form book to screen but it doesn't seem like the kind of material that requires a whole trilogy the tell the tale.

What we know is that Jackson is adding the Necromancer (which is only mentioned in the book and never seen). What else will he do will he add whole new scenes that were never in the book? If he wants to flesh out some moments than that's fine, but if he is really going to to make a trilogy of of this book then he has no excuse in not including everything in the book (he has three frigging movies to do it for gods sake!).

Whatever Jackson decides to do I trust him enough to deliver a fine movie experience, but this latest news are sings for cation for me.  We can only hope that Jackson isn't becoming a Lucas, if he is then God help us all.